R

rfrancis


Stress Fracture

something will eventually give



  • 1
If I'm remembering correctly, it was a lifeline the first time I was in the airport after 9/11, isolated from friends and family.

Social networking was a lifeline, or reading every single item everyone ever posts on social network was a lifeline? I urge you, if you must try to come up with a counterexample, to make sure you're countering what I said, not what appeared to be what I was saying in a skim. :)


Dude, I WAS agreeing with you. Golly.

I never really got into muds or mush, but moo is the place I hang out.

(Deleted comment)
Yeah, both mamamoira and I were modem-based BBS fiends long before the Internet, since the early 80s -- arguably we met because of them -- and as you say, pretty different vibe in some ways. (Although I have in fact met many of the DinoMUSH crowd, despite the distances.)

The difference between IRC and social mudding is largely one of flexible formatting, in my opinion. :)

Finally, a side note that I use yahoogroups such as pendant's in a not entirely different way from at least some of the points I make above -- I use gmail's mute feature to ignore some conversations entirely, for example. On the other hand, since I do read it in email, it otherwise tends to force that completist thing that I'm suggesting may not be the right way to use all social sites.

And I think this may be one place that you (and others) differ with me -- a lot of the complaints I hear about Facebook, for example, have to do with it being next to impossible to follow everything. Well, yes. Their default news feed view very clearly is built to NOT follow every single thing. It was one thing when it was BBSes and I only had to read the 8 messages that had shown up since yesterday. But I can't deal with, say, web forums. (I follow exactly 0 of them. This wasn't always the case, but it's never been more than a couple at any given time.) They want me to keep up with everything and, just, no, that's probably not how I should try to operate.

(As a side note to that last, Warren Ellis has done something interesting with his Whitechapel forum that I think actually encourages the jump in, read some fresh stuff, participate, move on sort of thing. Which, note, hasn't made me a regular there anyway, but that has more to do with just not feeling like it's my vibe.)

I dunno. These are not necessarily well-formed thoughts but they seem to ring true to me. I think there's also room for contemplation of how things compare to the old days on Usenet but I'm out of contemplation juice for the moment. :)


In the days of BBS, I missed having a graphical user interface. I didn't know that's what made me less than happy with it... but that was it.

I went to look, just to see. Wow. You've got 79 friends on LJ. I've got about half that. Well, and probably 2/3s of mine are utterly silent. So, keeping up with the handful of people who post is not much of a hardship.

Good point that the different sites have different expectation levels. People I keep up with think they've told me something if they post it on LJ, but I see very few Facebook entries that seem "important" in that same way. Doubtless because they don't know which part of their friends will see those line items. (Well, and how significant can you get in a one line post?)

Hmm. Hmm. Indeed. Things to ponder.


My default view is far fewer than 79. :)


  • 1
?

Log in